“I’m a domestic violence survivor”

I had to speak those words in a courtroom yesterday.

I was called for jury duty for my county. The last time I was called, I didn’t even go through a voir dire process. This time, I did. And there came a point when the judge asked people being considered for a spot on the jury if any of us had ever been the victim of a crime, or if anyone close to us had been.

He said, “Please raise your hand.”

For a split second, I thought about keeping my hand in my lap. But I couldn’t do it. I’d taken an oath.

So I raised my hand.

The rest of the prospective jurors left the room, and one by one, each of us victims had our turn with the judge, in front of the defendant, his lawyer and the prosecutor.

“So, Ms. Johnson, what is your story?” asked the judge.

Wow, what a loaded question.

“I’m a domestic violence survivor,” I said. “My daughter was also sexually molested by the same man, my ex-husband.”

The judge seemed startled, frankly. He didn’t say anything for a couple of beats. A man in his late 50s, slight, with completely gray hair — I figure he’s probably heard everything. His reaction actually startled me.

“Did these events happen simultaneously?”

Odd question.

“Well, they happened while I was married to him, and the sexual abuse continued after I divorced.”

“So you don’t know if these things happened at the same time.”

“They might have, sure. But I don’t know.”

“And did you contact the police?”

“Yes,” I said. It was true that the police got involved in my daughter’s situation. But not mine. I was always too terrified to call the police for what he was doing to me. Too risky.

“And were any charges filed?”

“No, your honor.”

“Why was that.”

“Insufficient evidence.”

And with that, it was over. I was not chosen to serve on the jury.

But the thing is, it’s not over. I did have to go back to the jury room today, but I was not called; I was released. My jury service is over, but my stress about that experience isn’t. I don’t say those words out loud very often — like, never. I don’t talk about that part of my life with many people. Almost no one except my family and my closest friends know the truth about me. Saying it out loud to people I didn’t know — I don’t care what their societal roles  were yesterday — was anxiety producing and horrible. Not to mention the fact that just stepping into a courtroom makes me want to throw up.

I’m going to bed early tonight to sleep off this stress. Hoping I’ll feel better in the morning …

Disturbed by the UN’s lack of initiative

This recent editorial in the NY Times points out that the UN is not taking action to prevent violence against women around the world. Pressured by countries whose religions and social values allow violence against women, the UN will not make a statement condemning it.

To quote the editorial, in part (emphasis mine):

“Some horrific events over the past few months, including the shooting of a Pakistani schoolgirl and the rape and murder of a young Indian physiotherapy student, should have been an alert for the world to unite in preventing violence against women.

But if a conference now under way at the United Nations is any guide, that message has not resounded with the necessary urgency. Halfway into their two-week annual meeting, delegates to the Commission on the Status of Women fear they will not be able to agree on a final communiqué, just like last year.

Who is to blame? Delegates and activists are pointing fingers at the Vatican, Iran and Russia for trying to eliminate language in a draft communiqué asserting that the familiar excuses — religion, custom, tradition — cannot be used by governments to duck their obligation to eliminate violence. The United Nations Human Rights Council endorsed similar language just six months ago.

Conservative hard-liners seem determined to fight it out again. They have also objected to references to abortion rights, as well as language suggesting that rape also includes forcible behavior by a woman’s husband or partner. 

Gender-based violence is an epidemic. A World Bank report estimated that more women between the ages of 15 and 44 were at risk from rape and domestic violence than from cancer, car accidents, war and malaria combined. According to the United Nations and other sources, more than 600 million women live in countries where domestic violence is not considered a crime and more than 3 million girls are facing female genital mutilation.”

It’s Lucy again: We have a long way to go, as people of the world, when this is the state of being for more than half of our population. I believe it is the patriarchal rule that still governs the world that has kept us in this place and will continue to do so.

I am so angry today

Why do the GOP Republicans believe that if you’re lesbian, gay, transgender, bisexual or Native American, you don’t deserve to be protected by the Violence Against Women Act?

The Senate passed the bill, intact, 78 to 22. Then it stalled in the House during the recess, which I wrote about.

Now, the GOP members of the House seem bent (no pun intended) on killing the bill entirely (also no pun intended).

Pertinent quote from a news story:

“Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have answered the Senate’s proposal to renew the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) by presenting their own version of the bill, but with protections of LGBT Americans taken out and a loophole that could exempt Native Americans victims of domestic abuse.

According to Think Progress, the House bill could derail renewal of the VAWA, killing any momentum the Senate bill had gathered since its proposal on Feb. 12.”

Raw Story (http://s.tt/1A92x)

I really don’t know what to say or what to think about our “leadership.” Can someone please explain it to me? Is it as simple and ugly as plain, garden-variety bigotry?

Finally, someone in the media writes about VAWA

In today’s Times, Nicholas Kristof discusses the expiration of the Violence Against Women Act.

Finally.

I have been so dismayed by the lack of media coverage of this topic, it’s been hard to stomach all the focus on the rape and death of that young woman in India as well as the media’s attention to gun control.

Do reporters and editors not see the connections here? They’re brighter than that, right? I suppose discussing the expiration of a law doesn’t garner the readership or viewership these other sensational stories do. Well isn’t that just too bad, that something as important as protecting women’s basic human rights in the U.S. doesn’t excite the media or our American population enough to warrant a front page headline.

Disgusting.

Apparently Congress had the opportunity, as well, to extend VAWA worldwide, at least symbolically: to call out other countries who fail to provide women with basic human rights.

But we can’t even do that here, in the U.S.

While I appreciate what Mr. Kristof writes in his column about the rising awareness of domestic violence in the U.S., it’s not enough. This is the year 2013, and we’re still struggling for basic understanding from lawyers and judges. From my personal experience, nothing has changed in the almost 30 years that I’ve been dealing with domestic violence, rape and child sexual abuse (22 years for the latter problem).

Awareness isn’t enough. Especially when our own “leadership” refuses to act even in the most basic way.

My shame grows. Not about being a domestic violence survivor, but about being an American.